"Android " and "fragmentation" are two terms that go together so often, it's sometimes hard to remember that Android is supposed to be a single platform. But how fragmented is Android? An app provider is now trying to answer that question with a study and some images.
The company, Open Signal, has been logging over the last six months new Android devices that have downloaded its OpenSignalMaps, which recommends the best network in an area. The data shows the model, brand, API level, and screen sizes for more than 680,000 devices. The result: 3,997 distinct devices and 599 brands.
Samsung Galaxy S II
Open Signal noted that the actual number of different devices is probably somewhat lower, since those devices with custom ROMs report back their identities differently than other devices.
Open Signal created a Device Model Map of its data, and another of Brands. Each contains larger squares representing the most popular devices and tiny ones standing in for the obscure ones. The resulting image looks like a distorted map of Manhattan, dominated by a few larger squares and then breaking into tiny slivers in one corner.
The most popular Android device in their survey is the Samsung Galaxy S II, with more than 61,000 users of Open Signal's app. The obscure devices represented by tiny slivers include the Concorde Tab from Hungary, the Lemon P1 in India, and the Energy Tablet i724 in Spain.
On the brand front, Samsung won again, representing about 40 percent of the total, or about 270,000 devices. Others include HTC, Sony Ericsson, Motorola, Verizon, Sprint, Huawei, KDDI, T-Mobile, Vodafone, Google, Cingular, and more -- nearly 600 in all.
There are also a variety of API levels, which are determined by their Android version. Open Signal said that API levels "have become more fragmented over time," which, they added, "seems natural" since older Android versions stay around.
The many API levels are challenging for developers, especially since the diversity is increasing. Open Signal said that the top two Android versions accounted for 90 percent when they conducted this survey a year ago. Now, they only account for about 75 percent.
The plus side of fragmentation is diversity and reach. Open Signal said that the many Android manufacturers and devices have allowed the OS to quickly reach markets in 195 countries, including a strong presence in developing countries. (continued...)
Based on your interest in this article, here's something that may be of interest to you also:
Recommended Reading: Search & Destroy: Why You Can't Trust Google Inc.
Synopsis: This is the other side of the Google story. In Search & Destroy, Google expert Scott Cleland, shows that the world's most powerful company is not who it pretends to be.
Google pretends to be a harmless lamb, but chose a full-size model of a Tyrannosaurus Rex as its mascot. Beware the T-Rex in sheep's clothing.
Posted: 2012-05-17 @ 11:36am PT
This isn't fragmentation. This represents the availability of a consumer's choice in Android devices.
Comparing versions of Android (2.X, 3.X, 4.0.X) would constitute an actual count of OS fragmentation.
Plus, I've come to the opinion that OS fragementation is merely a marketing term to tarnish the image of Android.
You don't see Microsoft Windows users (XP, Vista and 7 besides 2003 and 2008 server users) complaining and bickering about fragmentation and neither do you see that in Android users.
The reason is because the API calls remain fairly consistent across all versions (the implementation might vary with better algorithms) and thus, this negates all this ado about 'fragmentiation'.
A little more researched article might be more useful and informative rather than an article that falls for marketing and promoting FUD in the process.